HomePast ArticlesMagazineNewsNewsletterAuthorsJobsVideoDirectoryTwitterBlogEvents
Register to receive the LiDAR news Newsletter  
advertisement

eNewsletter

News

remove subscribe

LiDAR News Today


 

follow us on Twitter 

Sponsored By


TAS Lidar Content
TAS Content
Videos
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Sponsored By


Partner Sites

American Surveyor

machinecontrolonline 

lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ACSM
GIA
ASPRS

web2.0

LinkedIn Group
twitter
youtube
facebook group
rss

  LiDAR News     

Final Projects – Oregon State University Digital Terrain Modeling Class Winter 2012 Print E-mail
Written by Michael Olsen   
Saturday, 24 March 2012

It is that time of the quarter again where I am buried in projects to grade.  We just wrapped up another round of the Digital Terrain Modeling Course at OSU.  We had 17 graduate students in the class from backgrounds including Civil Engineering (many focused on Geomatics), Geography, Water Resources, Forestry Engineering, and Biological and Ecological Engineering.  In the class the students learn fundamental skills to program, work with LIDAR data, and apply those skills to create DTMs using several methods such as triangulation, ground filtering, gridding, and thin plate spline.  The students also use Cyclone software provided by Leica Geosystems to manipulate the point cloud data. 

I decided to distract myself from grading and write this quick article discussing the exciting and innovative projects that the students developed.  There were 6 groups, each who developed an outstanding presentation. 

The Wata Group

This group obtained LIDAR data for the Portland, Oregon area and performed a flood mapping analysis based on a portion of the data.  The students compared several techniques of DTM generation, breakline insertion, and combining LIDAR and bathymetry data to produce a high quality DTM.  They then used ArcGIS and Hec-Ras software to perform inundation studies, which were exported to Google Earth for visualization. 

Team Biomass

Team Biomass obtained LIDAR data for a forest in Northern California and extracted inventory data using the US Forest Service (USFS) software Fusion.  They then used those metrics to calculate biomass using a regression equation.  The LIDAR derived values were comparable to estimates derived through traditional techniques. 

Landsliders

This group extracted parameters such as slope and terrain roughness from a DTM to determine landslide susceptibility.  They compared slopes at locations with landslides to locations that did not have landslides using SLIDO (Statewide Landslide Information Database for Oregon) created by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI).  These comparisons could then be used to determine landslide susceptible areas. 

Dream Stream

This team used a point cloud created using Microsoft’s online service Photosynth to produce a terrain model of a stream channel bank.  This data was then compared to data acquired using a total station for erosion volume estimates.  This site experienced significant erosion when a major storm event occurred after a removal of a dam. 

RoughDaddis

This team used a micron-resolution scanner to scan surfaces to evaluate surface roughness.  The students performed a comprehensive comparison of all modes of the scanner (distance from surface, level of light, point density, and application of powder for improved reflectivity) and several methods to calculate surface roughness.  They also evaluated the impact of filling holes from occlusions in the model and its influence on the results. 

J.C.L.

Team JCL studied the Johnson Creek Landslide, which continually damages Highway 101 along the Oregon Coast.  This team used two terrestrial laser scan datasets to evaluate landslide movement.  The students extracted points from several trees across the site, created code to do a least squares fit of a circle to those points and compared movement of that tree in the two datasets.  The results were compared to cylinder extraction in Cyclone and were generally consistent (within 1-4 cm).  One tree had moved by 42 cm in the 6 months between datasets!  One student will continue this work to automate the procedure for his graduate thesis research project. 

Thanks to: The students who worked hard in the class, Leica Geosystems for providing software, and Chris Gifford-Miears, Rachelle Valverde, and Tseganeh Gichamo (The Wata Group) for providing the images! 

 
 
< Prev   Next >

 

Share this page with your favorite social networks! 

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

LiDARnews Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured LiDAR News Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact LiDAR

Google
 
LiDAR NEWS TOP STORY

3D LiDAR

99% Accurate Automated Canopy Mapping

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] lidarnews.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


White Papers
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

News Feeds

 
Subscribe to LiDARnews updates via friendfeed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial






©Spatial Media LLC - All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax