HomePast ArticleseMagNewsNewsletterAuthorsJobsVideoDirectoryTwitterForumBlog
 
advertisement


eNewsletter

News

remove subscribe

LiDAR News Today


 

follow us on Twitter 

Sponsored By


Featured Webinar

The solution for Point Clouds in AutoCAD

Product launch of new PointSense Plant Version 8.0

Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CDT

Register Here

TAS Lidar Content
TAS Content
Videos
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Sponsored By


Partner Sites

TAS


machinecontrolonline 

symbianone
lbszone.com
GISuser.com

Spatial Media LLC

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ACSM
GIA
ASPRS

web2.0

LinkedIn Group
twitter
youtube
facebook group
rss

Home arrow Authors   LiDAR News     

Complexities of an Urban Survey Print E-mail
Written by Stephen Clancy   
Thursday, 26 May 2011

Background

Recently we garnered some attention from the Charleston, WV press as well as LiDAR News regarding a project we are currently working on for the City.  Although we are months away from completion, our Mobile LiDAR field activities are complete, so I find this an opportune time to provide a broad overview of the complexities of an urban survey.  In past postings on Baker’s Mobile LiDAR blog, I’ve discussed the importance of planning.  Project planning comprises a myriad of mission-critical activities including the development and implementation of best-practices, such as those currently being examined by ASPRS’s Mobile Mapping Committee. These are a vital component to a project’s overall success.  Although you may spend hours or days planning and applying best-practices, there are still challenges to performing a large survey.

GPS

Combine tall buildings, rolling terrain and one lane, tree-lined mountain roads, and you have the makings of the perfect GPS storm.  We use Trimble Planning software to determine satellite visibility and PDOP – given a certain elevation mask.  However, the obstructions encountered due to the varying conditions have a dynamic impact on the collection.  Additionally, we approached the project as a survey-grade solution; where accuracy matters.  Knowing we would encounter conditions not conducive to ideal GPS conditions, our staff developed a GPS control network to utilize in post-collection adjustment.  The network of 800 control points distributed throughout the city, were utilized to spatially adjust captured point cloud data to ground control observations.   A local survey firm was utilized to establish the control network (via GPS surveying techniques) based on Baker’s derived control plan, prior to the LiDAR scanning, and to further accelerate the project schedule.  


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Google Earth KMZ depicting the control point layout was developed by our staff and provided to the local survey firm for use in establishing ground control.

 

Traffic

LiDAR scanning activities in urban/congested areas are highly efficient when performed during the night or early morning hours; a common practice utilized to mitigate local traffic conditions. This however, is not always an option for projects that also require the simultaneous capture of digital ground based photography; as was the case for the Charleston project.  In an effort to diminish the impact of traffic on travel speeds and data clean-up/processing, our crew performed collections during off-peak traffic hours, and categorized the road network throughout the city into two groups: 1) Central business district (“downtown”); and 2) residential.  The downtown areas were scanned during the weekend, where traffic would be at a minimum.  Conversely, the crew utilized the weekdays, during normal business hours, in the residential areas, anticipating residents would be at work and off the local roads.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Each SBET (sometimes a few a day due to weather) were exported to a Google Earth KMZ to perform cursory review of status.

 

Citizens

One of the primary reasons for the initial press was to introduce the residents to the presence of a mysterious vehicle roaming the streets of their city.  In the past, our crews have spent a good bit of time explaining to local residents that flag them down, (and occasionally law enforcement officials that haven’t been briefed by their supervisors) what it is that they were doing roaming neighborhoods.  Imaginations run wild when a strange looking vehicle with out-of-state tags comes driving by - perhaps the result of news articles about privacy rights and recordation of wireless networks and personal information play a small part.  Even with the press release and public service announcement, our crew was still approached, albeit dramatically reduced in volume, by pedestrians, homeowners and other citizens regarding the purpose of our activities.  In comes the last line of defense to maintain the production schedule – the “elevator pitch”.  Developing a standard, concise “elevator pitch” is a must to keep the system rolling – that is, unless you don’t have to worry about budgets and schedules.   If used properly, and of course delivered in a professional manner, the inquisitor receives the pertinent information they need to feel satisfied, and the crew gets to continue their work with minimal interruption.

 

 

 

 

 
< Prev   Next >

 

Share this page with your favorite social networks! 

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

LiDARnews Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured LiDAR News Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact LiDAR

Google
 
LiDAR NEWS TOP STORY


Driving Adoption 
  of LiDAR 

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] lidarnews.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


White Papers
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

News Feeds

 
Subscribe to LiDARnews updates via friendfeed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial






©Spatial Media LLC - All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax